On 07/30/2010 06:46 PM, Shirley Ma wrote:
quoted text > Hello Avi,
>
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 08:02 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> get_user_pages() is indeed slow. But what about
>> get_user_pages_fast()?
>>
>> Note that when the page is first touched, get_user_pages_fast() falls
>> back to get_user_pages(), so the latency needs to be measured after
>> quite a bit of warm-up.
> Yes, I used get_user_pages_fast, however if falled back to
> get_user_pages() when the apps doesn't allocate buffer on the same page.
> If I run a single ping, the RTT is extremely high, but when running
> multiple pings, the RTT time reduce significantly, but still it is not
> as fast as copy from my initial test. I am thinking that we might need
> to pre-pin memory pool.
>
I don't understand. Under what conditions do you use get_user_pages()
instead of get_user_pages_fast()? Why?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC PATCH v8 00/16] Provide a zero-copy method on KVM ... , Avi Kivity , (Sun Aug 1, 1:18 am)