On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:

quoted text
> From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 04:07:34 +0000
> 
> >  - For the pdt, calling into the prom once for each property/node to
> >    create a fdt, and then unflattening it.  This is better than the
> >    previous option, but I don't think the prom->fdt code will be
> > very nice.
> 
> I'll need this on sparc64 at some point to support kexec() anyways.
> 
> So at least for sparc you can assume that a something-->fdt translator
> is going to exist at some point in the future regardless of what
> happens here.
> 


Sounds like we have a winner.  I'll concentrate on that, thanks for
the heads up.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/