On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:52:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted text
> On Monday 05 July 2010 21:48:01 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:42:59PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > On 07/05/2010 12:24 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Peter, if you're fine with this version. May I apply it?
> > > > Unless you have a tree for autofs.
> > > > 
> > > Ian Kent is the maintainer of autofs4 and patches for autofs4 should go
> > > through him (or acked by him.)
> > > 
> > > autofs 3 is officially unmaintained; I'm more than happy to have you
> > > push the autofs 3 bits of this patch.
> > 
> > Sure, I can split up the patch and integrate the autofs 3 part, I'll send
> > the standalone autofs4 version to Ian.
> 
> I think in this case it's really more appropriate to change both autofs3
> and autofs4 together, to avoid interdependencies. Whichever way Ian
> prefers (ack the patch or take it) would work though.
> 
> 	Arnd


Yeah indeed. Ian?

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/