Re: ext4 performance regression 2.6.27-stable versus 2.6.32 and later

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ted Ts'o
Date: Thursday, July 29, 2010 - 7:20 pm

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:51:48PM +0200, Kay Diederichs wrote:

Could you try to do two things for me?  Using (preferably from a
recent e2fsprogs, such as 1.41.11 or 12) run filefrag -v on the files
created from your 2.6.27 run and your 2.6.32 run?

Secondly can capture blktrace results from 2.6.27 and 2.6.32?  That
would be very helpful to understand what might be going on.

Either would be helpful; both would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

						- Ted
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: ext4 performance regression 2.6.27-stable versus 2.6.3 ..., Ted Ts'o, (Thu Jul 29, 7:20 pm)
Re: ext4 performance regression 2.6.27-stable versus 2.6.3 ..., Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Mon Aug 2, 9:04 am)
Re: ext4 performance regression 2.6.27-stable versus 2.6.3 ..., Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Mon Aug 2, 9:10 am)