On 29 July 2010 19:50, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Daniel J Blueman
> <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If it's just kmemleak_init() we're talking about, slab caches are up at that
>>> point so you can just use kmalloc().
>>
>> The slab allocator isn't up at this point. With
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE set to 16K elements, an extra 3MB
>> of __initdata memory is used, but freed afterwards, and it works
>> great.
>
> Right. I guess the required earlylog buffer size would be smaller if
> we initialized kmemleak earlier. Can we do that in mm_init() after
> kmem_cache_init()?

Kmemleak uses kmem_cache_alloc() internally so we could initialise it
as soon as kmem_cache_init() was called. But it's really strange the
amount of early allocations that Daniel is getting. I've been happy so
far with 400, usually with standard Ubuntu-like configs and some
debugging turned on. Any idea what's causing these allocations?

-- 
Catalin
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/