On 07/28/2010 08:45 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:33 PM, tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
> <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>>
>> x86: Add memory modify constraints to xchg() and cmpxchg()
> 
> Ack. I assume this doesn't really change the code generated? At least
> not with a gcc that honors the whole memory clobber thing properly?
> 
> I also suspect that we can/should get rid of the __xg() thing - it was
> there just to make sure gcc didn't see the memory read as a single
> word and tried to optimize it. With the "+m" it probably doesn't
> matter any more (don't know if it ever did)
> 

For what it's worth, it fairly heavily preturbs code around
__set_64bit(), which implies it actually does something useful in that
case.  The rest of the code looks similar enough.

	-hpa

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/