Hi,
Am Mittwoch 23 Juni 2010 schrieb Andrew Morton:
quoted text > On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:55:54 -0300
> Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > > (top-posting repaired. Please don't do that).
> > >
> > > This wasn't a very good way to send a patch. I edited the diff,
> > > reconstructed the patch and then assembled a decent-looking changelog.
> > > I also changed your acked-by to the required signed-off-by, because you
> > > were on the patch's delivery path.
> > >
> > > Pretty please: next time, prepare a proper mergeable patch with the
> > > correct attributions and signoffs? Thanks.
> >
> > Sure, sorry. I was just not certain if I could just resent Helmut's patch to LKML without messing with his authorship.
>
> You can. Put his "From:" line right at the top of the changelog and
> everyone's patch-receiving tools will honour that. If the From: at the
> top of the changelog is absent, the tools will fall back to using the
> From: line in the mail headers.
This patch still didn't make it into mainline and it fixes a regression.
Rajiv, do you plan to resubmit the patch or did you expect it to go through
Andrew's tree?
Thanks,
Helmut
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] tpm_tis: Fix subsequent suspend failures , Helmut Schaa , (Fri Jul 23, 5:07 am)