Re: Existing netlink kernel <--> kernel communication

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Luis R. Rodriguez
Date: Monday, July 19, 2010 - 11:54 am

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote:

The reason we at Atheros were considering it was a possible way to
communicate between two different subsystems, in our case Bluetooth
and 802.11. While it is technically possible to use netlink for such
purposes it introduces a layer of complexity which can be avoided by
just using direct exported routines, and by coordinating between the
two subsystems you need communication with.

So, the real question I think is why do you need a rigid API ? If
there is a good need, perhaps its a good idea, but so far I guess no
one simply has come up with one.

  Luis
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Existing netlink kernel <--> kernel communication, Luis R. Rodriguez, (Mon Jul 19, 11:54 am)