On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:06:32 +0200, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
quoted text
>> 1/3: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/8/317

quoted text
> Ah, yes.  My personal taste would be to write fsg_string_serial_fill_n
> as an inline routine instead of as a macro, and not try to make it
> separate from fsg_string_serial_fill.

quoted text
>> 2/3: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/8/318

quoted text
> I have only one objection to this patch: The new parameter's name
> should be "serial", not "serial_parm".  (Compare it to all the other
> parameter names.)

Will change the two tomorrow.

quoted text
> As for the discussion between you and David...  I haven't tried to
> follow the details very carefully.  I get the impression that the two
> of you are talking past each other instead of coming to grips with a
> genuine issue.

I'm not entirely sure of what the issue with the patches is really.
It merely adds a serial number to the gadgets using MSF and that's all.

In any event, I am sure we will come to an agreement at one point. :)

-- 
Best regards,                                        _     _
| Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of  o' \,=./ `o
| Computer Science,  Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz       (o o)
+----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/