Re: [PPC64/Power7 - 2.6.35-rc5] Bad relocation warnings while Building a CONFIG_RELOCATABLE kernel with CONFIG_ISERIES enabled

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

On 19.07.2010, at 03:11, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:


If I turn them into 64-bit, will the values be > RMA? In that case things would break anyways. How does relocation work on PPC? Are the first few megs copied over to low memory? Would I have to mask anything in the above code to make sure I use the real values?

Alex

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
PPC64 2.6.34-rc6 warning - Is this expected ?, Subrata Modak, (Wed May 5, 4:50 am)
Re: PPC64 2.6.34-rc6 warning - Is this expected ?, Paul Mackerras, (Thu May 6, 10:40 pm)
Re: [PPC64/Power7 - 2.6.35-rc5] Bad relocation warnings wh ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Sun Jul 18, 6:11 pm)
Re: [PPC64/Power7 - 2.6.35-rc5] Bad relocation warnings wh ..., Alexander Graf, (Mon Jul 19, 12:36 am)