On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Joe Perches wrote:
Sorry, but that's one of the most convoluted changelogs I ever saw.
Errm, why is this related to pr_<level> in any way ?
It has absolutely _NOTHING_ to do with any implementation detail of
the function/macro which comes after those statements.
Terminating a statement with a comma is simply wrong by itself and it
needs to be fixed w/o further ado.
Thanks,
tglx
--