Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ux500: add ab8500-regulators machine specific data

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mark Brown
Date: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 - 11:42 am

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:06:51PM +0530, Sundar R IYER wrote:



This comes back to my point about the control only making sense when the
consumers are present - if you've got missing or partial consumer setup
done then control is questionable.


Yes.



Well, ultimately it's always triggered by software but the actual signal
to the regulator is often a logic level output by the SoC as the
processor enters a low power state rather than an I2C/SPI write.



If you think your users will be sympathetic to this approach then I
guess...  obviously, it does have the potential to go rather badly wrong
especially if there are some drivers without regulator support out
there.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ux500: add ab8500-regulators machine sp ..., Mark Brown, (Wed Jul 14, 11:42 am)