On 07/14/10 11:18, Dajun Chen wrote:
quoted text > LED module of the device driver for DA9052 PMIC device from Dialog
> Semiconductor.
>
> It is a resend for format disruptions in previous submission.
Hi Dajun,
I'm afraid quite a few comments in this review are fairly
general kernel coding issues that you will need to apply
to all of your patch set.
Don't suppose you can make the datasheet for this part easily
available. It would make reviewing this code much easier!
Sorry if I have missed it somewhere else in your patch set.
If not could you clarify what we have here. How are these
leds connected and controlled? It looks to me like you have
some multipurpose pins (not gpio's as they have pwm controls)
quoted text >
> Linux Kernel Version: 2.6.34
>
> Signed-off-by: D. Chen <dchen@diasemi.com>
> ---
> diff -urpN linux-2.6.34/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> linux-2.6.34_test/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> --- linux-2.6.34/drivers/leds/Kconfig 2010-05-17 02:17:36.000000000 +0500
> +++ linux-2.6.34_test/drivers/leds/Kconfig 2010-07-01 18:16:37.000000000 +0500
> @@ -225,6 +225,13 @@ config LEDS_DA903X
> This option enables support for on-chip LED drivers found
> on Dialog Semiconductor DA9030/DA9034 PMICs.
>
> +config LEDS_DA9052
> + tristate "LED Support for DA9052"
> + depends on PMIC_DA9052
> + help
> + This option enables support for on-chip LED drivers found
> + on Dialog Semiconductor DA9052 PMICs.
> +
> config LEDS_DAC124S085
> tristate "LED Support for DAC124S085 SPI DAC"
> depends on SPI
> diff -urpN linux-2.6.34/drivers/leds/leds-da9052.c
> linux-2.6.34_test/drivers/leds/leds-da9052.c
> --- linux-2.6.34/drivers/leds/leds-da9052.c 1970-01-01 05:00:00.000000000 +0500
> +++ linux-2.6.34_test/drivers/leds/leds-da9052.c 2010-07-01
> 18:16:23.000000000 +0500
> @@ -0,0 +1,297 @@
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/leds.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/mfd/da9052/reg.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/da9052/da9052.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/da9052/led.h>
> +
> +#define DRIVER_NAME "da9052-leds"
> +
These definitely need to be platform data rather
than defines in this file.
quoted text > +#define DA9052_LED4_PRESENT 1
> +#define DA9052_LED5_PRESENT 1
> +
> +
> +struct da9052_led_data {
> + struct led_classdev cdev;
> + struct work_struct work;
> + struct da9052 *da9052;
> + int id;
> + int new_brightness;
> + int is_led4_present;
> + int is_led5_present;
May be a silly question, but why are your only led's 4 and 5?
What happened to 1,2 and 3? Based on your reg defs, these are
have extra features. If you don't want to implement them now
then please state this somewhere.
quoted text > +};
> +
> +#define GPIO14_PIN 2 /* GPO Open Drain */
> +#define GPIO14_TYPE 0 /* VDD_IO1 */
> +#define GPIO14_MODE 1 /* Output High */
> +
> +#define GPIO15_PIN 2 /* GPO Open Drain */
> +#define GPIO15_TYPE 0 /* VDD_IO1 */
> +#define GPIO15_MODE 1 /* Output High */
These defines are far too generically named.
Please prefix with DA9052_ as then you'll be much
less likely to have a naming clash.
Actually looking at how you use them, they look like more
platform data elements rather than stuff that should be
defined here. These are particular choices relevant to a
particular design.
quoted text > +
> +#define MAXIMUM_PWM 95
> +#define MASK_GPIO14 0x0F
> +#define MASK_GPIO15 0xF0
> +#define GPIO15_PIN_BIT_POSITION 4
> +
> +static void da9052_led_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct da9052_led_data *led = container_of(work,
> + struct da9052_led_data, work);
> + int reg = 0;
> + int led_dim_bit = 0;
> + struct da9052_ssc_msg msg;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + switch (led->id) {
> + case DA9052_LED_4:
I would imagine these defines are not used elsewhere in your
driver set. If they aren't please move these led specific bits into
your led.h header. That will make this module more self contained
and easier to review.
quoted text > + reg = DA9052_LED4CONT_REG;
> + led_dim_bit = DA9052_LED4CONT_LED4DIM;
> + break;
> + case DA9052_LED_5:
> + reg = DA9052_LED5CONT_REG;
> + led_dim_bit = DA9052_LED5CONT_LED5DIM;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (led->new_brightness > MAXIMUM_PWM)
> + led->new_brightness = MAXIMUM_PWM;
> +
> + /* Always enable DIM feature
> + * This feature can be disabled if required
> + */
> + msg.addr = reg;
> + msg.data = led->new_brightness | led_dim_bit;
> +
> + da9052_lock(led->da9052);
> + led->da9052->write(led->da9052, &msg);
> + if (ret) {
> + da9052_unlock(led->da9052);
> + return;
> + }
> + da9052_unlock(led->da9052);
> +}
> +
> +static void da9052_led_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
> + enum led_brightness value)
> +{
> + struct da9052_led_data *led;
> +
> + led = container_of(led_cdev, struct da9052_led_data, cdev);
> + led->new_brightness = value;
> + schedule_work(&led->work);
> +}
> +
> +static int __devinit da9052_led_setup(struct da9052_led_data *led)
> +{
> + int reg = 0;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + struct da9052_ssc_msg msg;
> +
> + switch (led->id) {
> + case DA9052_LED_4:
> + reg = DA9052_LED4CONT_REG;
> + break;
> + case DA9052_LED_5:
> + reg = DA9052_LED5CONT_REG;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + msg.addr = reg;
> + msg.data = 0;
> +
> + da9052_lock(led->da9052);
> + ret = led->da9052->write(led->da9052, &msg);
> + if (ret) {
> + da9052_unlock(led->da9052);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + da9052_unlock(led->da9052);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int __devinit da9052_leds_prepare(struct da9052_led_data *led)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct da9052_ssc_msg msg;
> +
> + if (1 == led->is_led4_present) {
> + msg.addr = DA9052_GPIO1415_REG;
> + msg.data = 0;
> +
> + da9052_lock(led->da9052);
> + ret = led->da9052->read(led->da9052, &msg);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + msg.data = msg.data & ~(MASK_GPIO14);
> + msg.data = msg.data | (
> + GPIO14_PIN |
> + (GPIO14_TYPE ? DA9052_GPIO1415_GPIO14TYPE : 0) |
> + (GPIO14_MODE ? DA9052_GPIO1415_GPIO14MODE : 0));
> +
> + ret = led->da9052->write(led->da9052, &msg);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (1 == led->is_led4_present) {
> + msg.addr = DA9052_GPIO1415_REG;
> + msg.data = 0;
> +
> + ret = led->da9052->read(led->da9052, &msg);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + msg.data = msg.data & ~(MASK_GPIO15);
> + msg.data = msg.data |
> + (((GPIO15_PIN << GPIO15_PIN_BIT_POSITION) |
> + (GPIO15_TYPE ? DA9052_GPIO1415_GPIO15TYPE : 0) |
> + (GPIO15_MODE ? DA9052_GPIO1415_GPIO15MODE : 0))
> + );
> + ret = led->da9052->write(led->da9052, &msg);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + da9052_unlock(led->da9052);
> +out:
> + da9052_unlock(led->da9052);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int __devinit da9052_led_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct da9052_leds_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> + struct da9052_led_platform_data *led_cur;
> + struct da9052_led_data *led, *led_dat;
> + int ret, i;
> + int init_led = 0;
> +
> + if (pdata == NULL) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing platform data\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + if (pdata->num_leds < 1 || pdata->num_leds > DA9052_LED_MAX) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid led count %d\n", pdata->num_leds);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + led = kzalloc(sizeof(*led) * pdata->num_leds, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (led == NULL) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to alloc memory\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + led->is_led4_present = DA9052_LED4_PRESENT;
> + led->is_led5_present = DA9052_LED5_PRESENT;
> +
Perhaps some comments would clarify what is hapenning here.
quoted text > + ret = da9052_leds_prepare(led);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to init led driver\n");
> + goto err_free;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pdata->num_leds; i++) {
> + led_dat = &led[i];
> + led_cur = &pdata->led[i];
> +
> + if (led_cur->id > DA9052_LED_MAX || led_cur->id < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid id %d\n", led_cur->id);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_register;
> + }
> +
> + if (init_led & (1 << led_cur->id)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "led %d already initialized\n",
> + led_cur->id);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_register;
> + }
> +
> + init_led |= 1 << led_cur->id;
> + led_dat->cdev.name = led_cur->name;
> + led_dat->cdev.default_trigger = led_cur->default_trigger;
> + led_dat->cdev.brightness_set = da9052_led_set;
> + led_dat->cdev.brightness = LED_OFF;
> + led_dat->id = led_cur->id;
> + led_dat->da9052 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> +
> + INIT_WORK(&led_dat->work, da9052_led_work);
> +
> + ret = led_classdev_register(pdev->dev.parent, &led_dat->cdev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register led %d\n",
> + led_dat->id);
> + goto err_register;
> + }
> +
> + ret = da9052_led_setup(led_dat);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to init led %d\n",
> + led_dat->id);
> + i++;
> + goto err_register;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, led);
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_register:
> + for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> + led_classdev_unregister(&led[i].cdev);
> + cancel_work_sync(&led[i].work);
> + }
> +
> +err_free:
> + kfree(led);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int __devexit da9052_led_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct da9052_leds_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> + struct da9052_led_data *led = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pdata->num_leds; i++) {
> + da9052_led_setup(&led[i]);
> + led_classdev_unregister(&led[i].cdev);
> + cancel_work_sync(&led[i].work);
> + }
> +
> + kfree(led);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver da9052_led_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = DRIVER_NAME,
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + },
> + .probe = da9052_led_probe,
> + .remove = __devexit_p(da9052_led_remove),
> +};
> +
> +static int __init da9052_led_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&da9052_led_driver);
> +}
> +module_init(da9052_led_init);
> +
> +static void __exit da9052_led_exit(void)
> +{
> + platform_driver_unregister(&da9052_led_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(da9052_led_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("David Dajun Chen <dchen@diasemi.com>")
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("LED driver for Dialog DA9052 PMIC");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:" DRIVER_NAME);
> diff -urpN linux-2.6.34/drivers/leds/Makefile
> linux-2.6.34_test/drivers/leds/Makefile
> --- linux-2.6.34/drivers/leds/Makefile 2010-05-17 02:17:36.000000000 +0500
> +++ linux-2.6.34_test/drivers/leds/Makefile 2010-07-01 18:16:31.000000000 +0500
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_HP6XX) += leds-hp6xx.
> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_FSG) += leds-fsg.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_PCA955X) += leds-pca955x.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_DA903X) += leds-da903x.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_DA9052) += leds-da9052.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_WM831X_STATUS) += leds-wm831x-status.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_WM8350) += leds-wm8350.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_PWM) += leds-pwm.o
> diff -urpN linux-2.6.34/include/linux/mfd/da9052/led.h
> linux-2.6.34_test/include/linux/mfd/da9052/led.h
> --- linux-2.6.34/include/linux/mfd/da9052/led.h 1970-01-01
> 05:00:00.000000000 +0500
> +++ linux-2.6.34_test/include/linux/mfd/da9052/led.h 2010-07-01
> 18:17:11.000000000 +0500
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +#ifndef DA9052_LED_H
> +#define DA9052_LED_H
> +
> +struct da9052_led_platform_data {
> +#define DA9052_LED_4 4
> +#define DA9052_LED_5 5
> +#define DA9052_LED_MAX 2
> + int id;
> + const char *name;
> + const char *default_trigger;
> +};
> +
> +struct da9052_leds_platform_data {
> + int num_leds;
> + struct da9052_led_platform_data *led;
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* __LINUX_MFD_DA9052_H */
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/ Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/11] LEDS module of the device driver fo ... , Jonathan Cameron , (Wed Jul 14, 4:42 am)
