Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 - 7:01 pm

On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Heinz Diehl wrote:


I dont see anything in there at first glance that would cause slub to
increase its percpu usage. This is straight upstream?

Try to just comment out the BUILD_BUG_ON. I had it misfire before and
fixed the formulae to no longer give false positives. Maybe that is
another case. Tejun wanted that but never was able to give me an exact
formular to check for.

At the Ottawa Linux Symposium right now so responses may be delayed.
Hotels Internet connection keeps getting clogged for some reason.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Jul 9, 12:07 pm)
[S+Q2 02/19] percpu: make @dyn_size always mean min dyn_si ..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Jul 9, 12:07 pm)
[S+Q2 03/19] percpu: allow limited allocation before slab ..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Jul 9, 12:07 pm)
[S+Q2 05/19] SLUB: Constants need UL, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Jul 9, 12:07 pm)
[S+Q2 11/19] slub: Remove static kmem_cache_cpu array for boot, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Jul 9, 12:07 pm)
Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netper ..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Jul 12, 8:11 am)
Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netper ..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Jul 12, 10:00 am)
Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netper ..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Jul 13, 7:01 pm)
Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netper ..., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Jul 15, 1:17 pm)
Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netper ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Sun Jul 18, 5:16 pm)