Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 - 5:23 pm

On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:44:23 +0900
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> wrote:
 

It seems what I needed was good sleep....
How about this if 16M section is not acceptable ?

== NOT TESTED AT ALL, EVEN NOT COMPILED ==

register address of mem_section to memmap itself's page struct's pg->private field.
This means the page is used for memmap of the section.
Otherwise, the page is used for other purpose and memmap has a hole.

---
 arch/arm/mm/init.c     |   11 ++++++++++-
 include/linux/mmzone.h |   19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 mm/sparse.c            |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0701/include/linux/mmzone.h
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.35-0701.orig/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0701/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -1047,11 +1047,28 @@ static inline struct mem_section *__pfn_
 	return __nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn));
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_HAS_PIT
+void mark_memmap_pit(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool valid);
+static inline int page_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
+{
+	struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
+	struct page *__pg = virt_to_page(page);
+	return __pg->private == ms;
+}
+#else
+static inline int page_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+#endif
+
 static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
 {
+	struct mem_section *ms;
 	if (pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS)
 		return 0;
-	return valid_section(__nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)));
+	ms = __nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn));
+	return valid_section(ms) && page_valid(ms, pfn);
 }
 
 static inline int pfn_present(unsigned long pfn)
Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0701/mm/sparse.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.35-0701.orig/mm/sparse.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0701/mm/sparse.c
@@ -615,6 +615,43 @@ void __init sparse_init(void)
 	free_bootmem(__pa(usemap_map), size);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIT_SPARSEMEM_HAS_PIT
+/*
+ * Fill memmap's pg->private with a pointer to mem_section.
+ * pfn_valid() will check this later. (see include/linux/mmzone.h)
+ * The caller should call 
+ * 	mark_memmap_pit(start, end, true) # for all allocated mem_map
+ * 	and, after that,
+ * 	mark_memmap_pit(start, end, false) # for all pits in mem_map.
+ * please see usage in ARM.
+ */
+void mark_memmap_pit(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool valid)
+{
+	struct mem_section *ms;
+	unsigned long pos, next;
+	struct page *pg;
+	void *memmap, *end;
+	unsigned long mapsize = sizeof(struct page) * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
+
+	for (pos = start;
+	     pos < end; pos = next) {
+		next = (pos + PAGES_PER_SECTION) & PAGE_SECTION_MASK;
+		ms = __pfn_to_section(pos);
+		if (!valid_section(ms))
+			continue;
+		for (memmap = pfn_to_page(pfn), end = pfn_to_page(next-1);
+		     memmap != end + 1;
+		     memmap += PAGE_SIZE) {
+			pg = virt_to_page(memmap);
+			if (valid)
+				pg->private = ms;
+			else
+				pg->private = NULL;
+		}
+	}
+}
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
 static inline struct page *kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0701/arch/arm/mm/init.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.35-0701.orig/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0701/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@ -234,6 +234,13 @@ static void __init arm_bootmem_free(stru
 	arch_adjust_zones(zone_size, zhole_size);
 
 	free_area_init_node(0, zone_size, min, zhole_size);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
+	for_each_bank(i, mi) {
+		mark_memmap_pit(bank_start_pfn(mi->bank[i]),
+				bank_end_pfn(mi->bank[i]), true);
+	}
+#endif
 }
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
@@ -386,8 +393,10 @@ free_memmap(unsigned long start_pfn, uns
 	 * If there are free pages between these,
 	 * free the section of the memmap array.
 	 */
-	if (pg < pgend)
+	if (pg < pgend) {
+		mark_memap_pit(pg >> PAGE_SHIFT, pgend >> PAGE_SHIFT, false);
 		free_bootmem(pg, pgend - pg);
+	}
 }
 
 /*

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Minchan Kim, (Mon Jul 12, 8:53 am)
RE: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Kukjin Kim, (Mon Jul 12, 4:59 pm)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Mon Jul 12, 8:19 pm)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Minchan Kim, (Mon Jul 12, 9:11 pm)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Mon Jul 12, 9:23 pm)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Minchan Kim, (Mon Jul 12, 11:04 pm)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Mon Jul 12, 11:40 pm)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Russell King - ARM Linux, (Tue Jul 13, 12:20 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Jul 13, 12:34 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Jul 13, 12:58 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Jul 13, 1:02 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Jul 13, 1:03 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Minchan Kim, (Tue Jul 13, 1:06 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Johannes Weiner, (Tue Jul 13, 2:30 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Mel Gorman, (Tue Jul 13, 2:37 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Russell King - ARM Linux, (Tue Jul 13, 2:46 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Mel Gorman, (Tue Jul 13, 3:00 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Minchan Kim, (Tue Jul 13, 8:43 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Dave Hansen, (Tue Jul 13, 9:35 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Minchan Kim, (Tue Jul 13, 9:44 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Russell King - ARM Linux, (Tue Jul 13, 11:39 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Dave Hansen, (Tue Jul 13, 1:46 pm)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Jul 13, 5:23 pm)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Minchan Kim, (Tue Jul 13, 11:44 pm)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Wed Jul 14, 12:10 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Minchan Kim, (Wed Jul 14, 12:35 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Wed Jul 14, 12:39 am)
RE: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, Kukjin Kim, (Wed Jul 14, 12:50 am)
Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Wed Jul 14, 1:09 am)