Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Zhang, Yanmin
Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 - 5:13 pm

On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 17:16 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Sorry for confusing you. It's bit0, mapping to PERFMON_EVENTSEL0.

I found the status bit is set by triggering sysrq to dump PMU registers.

If I start perf by gdb, sometimes, perf could work. I found one processor's 1st status
register is equal to 0 while other processors' are 1. If just starting perf, all 1st
status registers are equal to 1.



--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc, Zhang, Yanmin, (Tue Jul 13, 1:14 am)
Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jul 13, 1:50 am)
Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Jul 13, 8:16 am)
Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc, Zhang, Yanmin, (Tue Jul 13, 5:13 pm)
Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Jul 13, 5:36 pm)
Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc, Zhang, Yanmin, (Tue Jul 13, 5:49 pm)
Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc, Zhang, Yanmin, (Tue Jul 13, 7:22 pm)
Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed Jul 14, 1:15 am)
Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Aug 3, 5:20 am)
Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc, Stephane Eranian, (Wed Aug 4, 8:48 am)
Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc, Zhang, Yanmin, (Thu Aug 5, 10:39 pm)
[tip:perf/urgent] perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming ..., tip-bot for Zhang, Y ..., (Wed Aug 18, 3:27 am)