Re: [PATCH][RFC] tracing: Use class->reg() for all registering of events

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wednesday, June 9, 2010 - 4:53 am

On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 17:17 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:

Ah, ok, then we're talking about two different issues, the patch I
referred to solves a possible /0 in the kernel which triggers easily
with software events because of that unsigned comparison.

I'll have to defer to Arnaldo on the newt issue.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH][RFC] tracing: Use class->reg() for all registe ..., Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Jun 9, 4:53 am)
Re: [PATCH][RFC] tracing: Use class->reg() for all registe ..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Wed Jun 9, 5:02 am)
Re: [PATCH][RFC] tracing: Use class->reg() for all registe ..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Wed Jun 9, 5:23 am)
Re: [PATCH][RFC] tracing: Use class->reg() for all registe ..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Wed Jun 9, 5:35 am)
Re: [PATCH][RFC] tracing: Use class->reg() for all registe ..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Thu Jun 10, 7:07 am)