On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:16:17AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Yes.
CONFIG_HUGETLBFS controls hugetlbfs interface code.
OTOH, CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE controls hugepage management code.
So we should use CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE here.
I attached a fix patch below. This includes another fix in
include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h (commented by Mel Gorman.)
Andi-san, could you add this patch on top of your tree?
Agreed.
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
---
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 10:32:08 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] replace ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS into ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
CONFIG_HUGETLBFS controls hugetlbfs interface code.
OTOH, CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE controls hugepage management code.
So we should use CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE here.
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
---
include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h | 4 ++--
mm/rmap.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h b/include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h
index cf00b6d..6931489 100644
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h
+++ b/include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_HUGETLB_INLINE_H
-#define _LINUX_HUGETLB_INLINE_H 1
+#define _LINUX_HUGETLB_INLINE_H
-#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS
+#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
#include <linux/mm.h>
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 5278371..f7114c6 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1436,7 +1436,7 @@ int rmap_walk(struct page *page, int (*rmap_one)(struct page *,
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MIGRATION */
-#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS
+#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
/*
* The following three functions are for anonymous (private mapped) hugepages.
* Unlike common anonymous pages, anonymous hugepages have no accounting code
@@ -1477,4 +1477,4 @@ void hugepage_add_new_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, 0);
__hugepage_set_anon_rmap(page, vma, address, 1);
}
-#endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLBFS */
+#endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
--
1.7.0.1
--