On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 08:32:35PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
quoted text > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 01:06:32PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > Changing the guest virtio to match the backend is a problem,
> > this breaks migration etc.
>
> As long as it's done in a backwards compatible way it should be
> fine.
Possibly, but to me the need to do this implies that
we'll need another change with different hardware at the backend.
quoted text > It's just like migrating from a backend that supports TSO
> to one that doesn't.
>
> Cheers,
Exactly. We don't support such migration.
quoted text > --
> Visit Openswan at
http://www.openswan.org/
> Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> Home Page:
http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
> PGP Key:
http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC PATCH v7 01/19] Add a new structure for skb buffe ... , Michael S. Tsirkin , (Sun Jun 20, 3:39 am)