Re: weird umem vs nfsd regression

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thursday, June 17, 2010 - 1:47 pm

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> wrote:


gee, who maintains umem?  Neil wrote it eight years ago ;)


Given that the kernel is still running initcalls, nfsd hasn't done
anything yet.  So it might be a weird ordering thing, or someone has
scribbled on some memory somewhere and shuffling things around in nfsd
is what caused the memory scribble to scrible on something which
someone cares about.

Ugly.  Perhaps try enabling every kernel debug option you can lay your
hands on?




There may also be bugs in the umem driver.  Even if the IO errors are
bogus, the kernel shouldn't hang up waiting for IO completion as it's
doing here.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
weird umem vs nfsd regression, Sage Weil, (Thu Jun 17, 1:21 pm)
Re: weird umem vs nfsd regression, Andrew Morton, (Thu Jun 17, 1:47 pm)
Re: weird umem vs nfsd regression, Neil Brown, (Thu Jun 17, 7:54 pm)
Re: weird umem vs nfsd regression, Sage Weil, (Thu Jun 17, 9:16 pm)
Re: weird umem vs nfsd regression, Andrew Morton, (Thu Jun 17, 9:17 pm)
Re: weird umem vs nfsd regression, Sage Weil, (Thu Jun 17, 9:44 pm)