On 06/17/2010 09:52 AM, Pan, Jacob jun wrote:
quoted text >> On 06/16/2010 02:11 PM, Pan, Jacob jun wrote:
>>>
>>> W.R.T. the loop limits, is it possible to use a default max_loops
>> value in
>>> case when cpu_khz is not set? The reason is that on Moorestown
>> platform
>>> we need to do an early APIC setup before tsc_init(), so cpu_khz is 0
>> at the
>>> time we setup local APIC. The result is that we hit
>> WARN_ON(max_loops<= 0)
>>> on Moorestown for early APIC setup.
>>>
>>> The early APIC setup is needed because Moorestown does not have a PIT
>> and the
>>> system timer interrupts are routed via IOAPIC.
>>>
>>
>> Can't MRST install a quick ballpark value into cpu_khz?
>>
> yes, we can do that to avoid the warning. the true cpu_khz can then be set
> in tsc_init by platform specific calibration code. That is one option.
>
Seems like a reasonable thing to do to me.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] x86 apic: Ack all pending irqs when crashed/on ... , H. Peter Anvin , (Thu Jun 17, 10:00 am)