Re: [PATCH 5/9] oom: cleanup has_intersects_mems_allowed()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Rientjes
Date: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 - 9:20 pm

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:


I disagree that the renaming of the variables is necessary, please simply 
change the while (tsk != start) to use while_each_thread(tsk, start);
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/9] oom: don't try to kill oom_unkillable child, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Jun 16, 6:45 pm)
[PATCH 3/9] oom: make oom_unkillable_task() helper function, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Jun 16, 6:51 pm)
[PATCH 5/9] oom: cleanup has_intersects_mems_allowed(), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Jun 16, 6:51 pm)
[PATCH 8/9] oom: give the dying task a higher priority, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Jun 16, 6:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/9] oom: cleanup has_intersects_mems_allowed(), David Rientjes, (Wed Jun 16, 9:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/9] oom: cleanup has_intersects_mems_allowed(), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Mon Jun 21, 4:45 am)
Re: [PATCH 5/9] oom: cleanup has_intersects_mems_allowed(), David Rientjes, (Mon Jun 21, 1:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/9] oom: cleanup has_intersects_mems_allowed(), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Jun 30, 2:26 am)
<