Re: [PATCH] tracing: use correct string size for snprintf

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 - 1:52 pm

On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 12:29 -0400, Chase Douglas wrote:

I see that because nsecs_str is based off of nsecs_rem which is the
remainder of a division of a 1000, that it wont ever be more than 4 in
length. For this, I'll remove the "Cc: stable" part and queue it for 36.
No urgent need for now.

But I still think it should be added, just because it looks to fragile
to have what is in the kernel now.

Thanks!

-- Steve



--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] tracing: use correct string size for snprintf, Chase Douglas, (Tue Jun 15, 9:29 am)
Re: [PATCH] tracing: use correct string size for snprintf, Steven Rostedt, (Tue Jun 15, 1:52 pm)
[tip:perf/core] tracing/function-graph: Use correct string ..., tip-bot for Chase Do ..., (Tue Jun 29, 2:24 am)