On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 03:40:28AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:02:45AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I suspect you miss quite a lot of valuable information from
> > your user base by not supporting kerneloops.org. On the other
> > hand it would likely also save you from spending time on 
> > flakes.
> > 
> > That said you don't need BUG_ON to support it (WARN etc. work
> > too), it's just the easiest way.
> 
> Note that a XFS filesystem shutdown already gives a stack trace.
> But picking up every filesystem shutdown on kerneloops.org seems
> to be quite a bit too much.  It's usually due to IO errors from
> the underlying device.

Yes, but known race check asserts should be probably there, right?
Maybe you need a special kind of ASSERT (or shutdown) for those? 

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/