On 06/14/2010 01:48 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
quoted text
> On 13:26 Mon 14 Jun     , Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>> @@ -617,8 +616,7 @@ int search_by_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct cpu_key *key,	/* Key to s
>>
>>   	pathrelse(search_path);
>>
>> -	right_neighbor_of_leaf_node = 0;
>> -
>> +	
>
> This hunk introduces whitespace on the empty line, which is not cool.

I can resend!!(biggest problem is working
through these warnings)

quoted text
>
>>   	/* With each iteration of this loop we search through the items in the
>>   	   current node, and calculate the next current node(next path element)
>>   	   for the next iteration of this loop.. */
>> @@ -695,8 +693,7 @@ int search_by_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct cpu_key *key,	/* Key to s
>>   			   starting from the root. */
>>   			block_number = SB_ROOT_BLOCK(sb);
>>   			expected_level = -1;
>> -			right_neighbor_of_leaf_node = 0;
>> -
>> +			
>
> Here, too.
>
> Most of the patches in this series have similar issues.
>

main thing now(for me atleast)is,
is this actual dead code or what?
if not then something else needs to
be done, if yes then I guess I can
resend this, with out the whitespace
issue.

Justin P. Mattock
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/