Re: mmotm 2010-06-11-16-40 uploaded

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Saturday, June 12, 2010 - 8:38 pm

Hi Andrew,

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:10:14 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

Yeah, these comments were more reflections on the "import to git"
procedures than on the patches themselves.


They were not the problem (for me at least).


Thanks.


Not really necessary, git am is a but anal in that regard (for good
reason usually).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
mmotm 2010-06-11-16-40 uploaded, akpm, (Fri Jun 11, 4:40 pm)
Re: mmotm 2010-06-11-16-40 uploaded, Andrew Morton, (Fri Jun 11, 5:22 pm)
Re: mmotm 2010-06-11-16-40 uploaded, Randy Dunlap, (Fri Jun 11, 6:31 pm)
Re: mmotm 2010-06-11-16-40 uploaded, Andrew Morton, (Fri Jun 11, 6:48 pm)
Re: mmotm 2010-06-11-16-40 uploaded, Dave Young, (Fri Jun 11, 7:43 pm)
Re: mmotm 2010-06-11-16-40 uploaded, Andrew Morton, (Fri Jun 11, 7:54 pm)
Re: mmotm 2010-06-11-16-40 uploaded, Andres Salomon, (Fri Jun 11, 10:59 pm)
Re: mmotm 2010-06-11-16-40 uploaded - busticated patch?, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Sat Jun 12, 1:50 am)
Re: mmotm 2010-06-11-16-40 uploaded, Stephen Rothwell, (Sat Jun 12, 8:37 am)
Re: mmotm 2010-06-11-16-40 uploaded, Andrew Morton, (Sat Jun 12, 10:10 am)
Re: mmotm 2010-06-11-16-40 uploaded, Stephen Rothwell, (Sat Jun 12, 8:38 pm)