> Le Thursday 10 June 2010 01:30:31 Bjorn Helgaas, vous avez écrit :
> > On Tuesday, June 08, 2010 05:36:33 pm Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > On 06/08/2010 03:48 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, June 08, 2010 03:43:50 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In this case, the aperture *size* from the BIOS is actually OK, but
> > > > the beginning of the aperture overlaps system memory. With Yinghai's
> > > > patch, we reduce the size and move the start. Windows was able to
> > > > just move the start of the aperture and preserve the original
> > > > 0x20000000 size (but I think it had to move something else out of
> > > > the way).
> > >
> > > are you sure? that looks more aggressive.
> >
> > I don't have the machine and can't be 100% sure, but based on what
> > Yannic reported here:
> >
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16009#c11, it looks like
> > Windows moved that aperture.
> >
> > I haven't used it myself, but possibly a program like SIV
> > (
http://rh-software.com/) would give more detailed information
> > about what Windows is doing.
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> I don't know if it's useful, but here some output of SIV concerning PCI and
> the Radeon card.
