Hi Christoph,
On 06/11/2010 02:56 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted text > This looks correct, but still has the second if ATTR_SIZE block that
> I commented on last time. I'd really prefer if the filesystems could
> move the truncate handling into a single conditional to simplify
> auditing for it and possibly splitting it out into a separate method
> later.
oh, that would be much work for ocfs2 to do from my perspective. So I
would really want to leave it as-is and I have add it to my to-do list.
quoted text >
> And btw, the S_ISREG check which you only have on the first ATTR_SIZE
> check is superflous, the VFS only does ATTR_SIZE calls on regular files.
yeah, I can remove it.
Regards,
Tao
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH v4] ocfs2: Let ocfs2_setattr use new truncate s ... , Tao Ma , (Fri Jun 11, 12:16 am)