Hello,
On 06/10/2010 03:28 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
quoted text > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I'm sure its a good idea to provide an interface that does't _require_
> server side mmaps. This doesn't preclude an mmap interface later on,
> but I'd rather start with a "pure" read/write device interface, which
> is in a lot of ways simpler to solve than mmap.
It doesn't preclude that but then again having two interfaces can be a
bit silly.
quoted text > As for pinning kernel pages, I still think it's a good idea for the
> char device interface, but you're right, it's not necessary.
>
> In fact I'm mostly ready with an implementation of store/retrieve that
> just pokes the regular page cache.
But I think if we can avoid using pinned kernel pages, pure r/w based
implementation could be different and useful enough, so yeah, great.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [fuse-devel] OSS Proxy Jack slave , Tejun Heo , (Thu Jun 10, 8:26 am)