Re: [fuse-devel] OSS Proxy Jack slave

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Thursday, June 10, 2010 - 6:13 am

Hello,

Nope, it's not required for osspd but it's a rather strong limitation on the interface which would be pretty difficult to work around later.  Page protection tricks would be very cumbersome and unscalable.  Hmmm, it does remove the necessity for allocating kernel pages, right?  Still, it seems like a big limitation.  Are you sure this is a good idea?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [fuse-devel] OSS Proxy Jack slave, Tejun Heo, (Thu Jun 10, 6:13 am)
Re: [fuse-devel] OSS Proxy Jack slave, Miklos Szeredi, (Thu Jun 10, 6:28 am)
Re: [fuse-devel] OSS Proxy Jack slave, Tejun Heo, (Thu Jun 10, 8:26 am)