> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:10 AM, <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:19:29AM +0100, Alex Buell wrote:
> >>
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=14976
> >>
> >> Question: Why?
> >
> > One of the theories that has been advanced is that it's simply this
> > problem:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/22/154
> >
> > If so, it points out how idiotic Phoronix is about not being able to
> > notice udev pegging the CPU at 100% being someone bad for its
> > benchmark runs. :-)
> >
> > OTOH, this bug has been known for over a week, and it is sort sad that
> > we haven't reverted this patch. It looks like the conversation has
> > died, but without a fix?
>
> It's fixed by 1eb2cbb6d5efe129 so the problem doesn't exist for 2.6.35-r1.