Re: RFD: Should we remove the HLT check? (was Re: [PATCH 1/8] x86: avoid check hlt if no timer interrupts)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

On 05/07/2010 03:24 PM, Alan Cox wrote:

I think family < 5 seems a reasonable cutoff.

Note that the ATA transfer bug you describe above would not be caught by
the existing check.

	-hpa

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: RFD: Should we remove the HLT check? (was Re: [PATCH ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri May 7, 1:33 pm)
Re: RFD: Should we remove the HLT check? (was Re: [PATCH ..., H. Peter Anvin, (Fri May 7, 3:27 pm)
Re: RFD: Should we remove the HLT check? (was Re: [PATCH ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri May 7, 3:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 7/8] x86/mrst: add vrtc driver which serves as ..., Thomas Gleixner, (Tue May 18, 12:38 am)