* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

quoted text
> Hello,
> 
> On 05/06/2010 08:28 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > ( They are also under intense optimization - the jump-tracepoints patch makes 
> >   them probably even cheaper than preempt notifiers, in the off case. )
> 
> I mostly agree on other points but TPs and sched_notifiers are inherently 
> different in how they are enabled/disabled. sched_notifiers are 
> enabled/disabled per-task and at least w/ cmwq, there will always be some 
> tasks with active sched_notifiers so code level optimizations aren't really 
> useful.

Note that preempt notifiers used to modify scheduling behavior/semantics i'm 
really against. Please get that functionality into the scheduler - especially 
if it's essentially always-on.

Preempt notifiers are for things like KVM which want to do extended context 
saving. They are _NOT_ 'hooks' into the scheduler.

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/