Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Brian Swetland
Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 - 4:42 pm

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Kevin Hilman
<khilman@deeprootsystems.com> wrote:

The constraint stuff is definitely something I'd love to talk about in
detail.  It's a problem that I think is common to every SoC I've
worked with.  Having a general solution for this problem (of
specifying and observing various constraints for clock, power, qos,
etc) kernel-wide would seem like a big win.

Might be worth kicking some design ideas around and getting a bunch of
the interested parties together at some of the upcoming linux
conference things this fall on the east coast?

Brian
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6), Alan Stern, (Wed May 5, 1:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6), Mark Brown, (Wed May 5, 1:15 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 5, 1:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6), Kevin Hilman, (Wed May 5, 4:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 5, 4:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6), Brian Swetland, (Wed May 5, 4:42 pm)