On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
quoted text >>
>> Oh, like tell the modem that user mode has handled the ring event and
>> its ok to un-block?
>
> No, that's not how it works. It would go like this:
>
> The modem IRQ handler queues its event to the input subsystem.
> As it does so the input subsystem enables a suspend blocker,
> causing the system to stay awake after the IRQ is done.
>
> The user program enables its own suspend blocker before reading
> the input queue. When the queue is empty, the input subsystem
> releases its suspend blocker.
>
> When the user program finishes processing the event, it
> releases its suspend blocker. Now the system can go back to
> sleep.
>
> At no point does the user program have to communicate anything to the
> modem driver, and at no point does it have to do anything out of the
> ordinary except to enable and disable a suspend blocker.
Exactly -- and you can use the same style of overlapping suspend
blockers with other drivers than input, if the input interface is not
suitable for the particular interaction.
Brian
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/8] PM: Add suspend block api. , Brian Swetland , (Wed May 5, 2:37 pm)