Fredrick Prashanth John Berchmans <fredrickprashanth@gmail.com> writes:

quoted text
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:59:42PM -0700, Fredrick Prashanth John Berchmans wrote:
>>> The box was running kernel version 2.6.27.10.
>>> But I think the FAT code has not changed much.
>>
>> But the nfsd code has and now doesn't call lookup from the filldir
>> callback anymore.
>>
>>
>
> Ah..I just noticed the changes in the nfsd code.
>
> But in 2.6.27.10, can it be fixed by removing the lock_super in the
> vfat_lookup.?

Basically, yes.

quoted text
> Because I saw some discussions long back of regressions due to
> replacing lock_kernel by lock_super in FAT code.

Yes. Current way is ultra safer side to convert BKL. Another side was
just to remove BKL. However, at least for now, we are using current way.

So, if current way had a problem, just remove it instead of trying to
fix (then, review).

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/