On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 09:39:56PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
quoted text
> Which begs the question why _is_ UML sucking in x86 stuff and can anyone
> provide us with some sensible reasons? Because if there aren't any, it
> is their includes that should be fixed. Let me see what I can do to
> redirect hweight stuff properly...

Generally, UML pulls in the host arch headers because they work.  When
they are only architecture-dependent (and not, say, depending on the
host task struct or something), they're fine.

What's the include path from UML to the x86 hweight stuff?

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/