> > The event was not lost.
quoted text >
> Not lost, but not delivered. So you need your policy agent to send
it will be delivered next time the process wakes. It's not lost.
quoted text > SIGCONT when you receive any wakeup event, which either means proxying
> all your network traffic through your policy agent or having some
> mechanism for alerting the policy agent whenever you leave the deep idle
> state.
You didn't mention that requirement last time.
quoted text > > > also the race of an application being in the middle of handling a wakeup
> > > event when you send it the signal.
> >
> > sigmask()
>
> Doesn't help - I may be hit by the signal between the poll() unblocking
> and me having the opportunity to call sigmask().
ppoll(). This is all existing solved stuff.
Alan
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) , Alan Cox , (Thu May 27, 1:53 pm)