On Mit, 2010-05-26 at 13:23 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 19:51 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
[...]
quoted text
> > Darn, _we_ have to deal with that forever as it sets a crappy user
> > space ABI in stone.
> 
> I really don't see how it is ... the ABI comes with a switch that allows
> it to be disabled, so only platforms wishing to use it have to support
> it.  Even on those platforms that do support it, we can translate most

You completely missed the point: The crappy user interface - and
interferences with pother subsystems - must be maintained for ages - and
that is independent if one uses it or not. Even worse if it's not widely
used.

quoted text
> of it into pm QoS stuff and if one day someone solves the rogue app
> problem, we can migrate over.

If it's so important for Android and no one else, Android can carry it
out of tree.

	Bernd
-- 
Bernd Petrovitsch                  Email : bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at
                     LUGA : http://www.luga.at

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/