Re: [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 - 10:26 pm

On Thu, 27 May 2010 08:26:25 am Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

OK, combo meal deal below, against Linus' latest.  I'd really appreciate
a report, since AFAIK you're the only one hitting it, and only when that
other (now reverted) patch was applied.

As an side to Brandon: I can see how my patch fixed an explicit request_module
inside module_init (that's how I tested it).  I can't see how we have a
problem with an implicit dependency such as bne2x->crc32.  Modules go into
the live state without retaking the lock.  If you can still reproduce that
now Linus has reverted, I'm afraid we need to dig deeper...

Thanks,
Rusty.

diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -563,33 +563,26 @@ int use_module(struct module *a, struct 
 	struct module_use *use;
 	int no_warn, err;
 
-	if (b == NULL || already_uses(a, b)) return 1;
+	if (b == NULL || already_uses(a, b))
+		return 0;
 
 	/* If we're interrupted or time out, we fail. */
-	if (wait_event_interruptible_timeout(
-		    module_wq, (err = strong_try_module_get(b)) != -EBUSY,
-		    30 * HZ) <= 0) {
-		printk("%s: gave up waiting for init of module %s.\n",
-		       a->name, b->name);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	/* If strong_try_module_get() returned a different error, we fail. */
+	err = strong_try_module_get(b);
 	if (err)
-		return 0;
+		return err;
 
 	DEBUGP("Allocating new usage for %s.\n", a->name);
 	use = kmalloc(sizeof(*use), GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!use) {
 		printk("%s: out of memory loading\n", a->name);
 		module_put(b);
-		return 0;
+		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
 	use->module_which_uses = a;
 	list_add(&use->list, &b->modules_which_use_me);
 	no_warn = sysfs_create_link(b->holders_dir, &a->mkobj.kobj, a->name);
-	return 1;
+	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(use_module);
 
@@ -882,7 +875,7 @@ static inline void module_unload_free(st
 
 int use_module(struct module *a, struct module *b)
 {
-	return strong_try_module_get(b) == 0;
+	return strong_try_module_get(b);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(use_module);
 
@@ -1053,17 +1046,39 @@ static const struct kernel_symbol *resol
 	struct module *owner;
 	const struct kernel_symbol *sym;
 	const unsigned long *crc;
-
+	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+	int err;
+	long timeleft = 30 * HZ;
+
+again:
 	sym = find_symbol(name, &owner, &crc,
 			  !(mod->taints & (1 << TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE)), true);
-	/* use_module can fail due to OOM,
-	   or module initialization or unloading */
-	if (sym) {
-		if (!check_version(sechdrs, versindex, name, mod, crc, owner)
-		    || !use_module(mod, owner))
-			sym = NULL;
+	if (!sym)
+		return NULL;
+
+	if (!check_version(sechdrs, versindex, name, mod, crc, owner))
+		return NULL;
+
+	prepare_to_wait(&module_wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+	err = use_module(mod, owner);
+	if (likely(!err) || err != -EBUSY || signal_pending(current)) {
+		finish_wait(&module_wq, &wait);
+		return err ? NULL : sym;
 	}
-	return sym;
+
+	/* Module is still loading.  Drop lock and wait. */
+	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
+	timeleft = schedule_timeout(timeleft);
+	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
+	finish_wait(&module_wq, &wait);
+
+	/* Module might be gone entirely, or replaced.  Re-lookup. */
+	if (timeleft)
+		goto again;
+
+	printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: gave up waiting for init of module %s.\n",
+	       mod->name, owner->name);
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2014,6 +2029,7 @@ static noinline struct module *load_modu
 	long err = 0;
 	void *ptr = NULL; /* Stops spurious gcc warning */
 	unsigned long symoffs, stroffs, *strmap;
+	void __percpu *percpu;
 
 	mm_segment_t old_fs;
 
@@ -2158,6 +2174,8 @@ static noinline struct module *load_modu
 			goto free_mod;
 		sechdrs[pcpuindex].sh_flags &= ~(unsigned long)SHF_ALLOC;
 	}
+	/* Keep this around for failure path. */
+	percpu = mod_percpu(mod);
 
 	/* Determine total sizes, and put offsets in sh_entsize.  For now
 	   this is done generically; there doesn't appear to be any
@@ -2463,7 +2481,7 @@ static noinline struct module *load_modu
 	module_free(mod, mod->module_core);
 	/* mod will be freed with core. Don't access it beyond this line! */
  free_percpu:
-	percpu_modfree(mod);
+	free_percpu(percpu);
  free_mod:
 	kfree(args);
 	kfree(strmap);


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 25, 2:00 pm)
Re: [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 25, 3:54 pm)
Re: [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 25, 4:47 pm)
Re: [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 26, 8:41 am)
Re: [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 26, 3:56 pm)
Re: [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 26, 4:07 pm)
Re: [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args, Rusty Russell, (Wed May 26, 10:26 pm)
Re: [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args, Brandon Philips, (Thu May 27, 11:46 am)
Re: [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu May 27, 2:57 pm)
Re: [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args, Rusty Russell, (Mon May 31, 12:54 am)
[PATCH 0/2] kernel/module.c locking changes, Rusty Russell, (Mon May 31, 5:00 am)
[PATCH 1/2] module: make locking more fine-grained., Rusty Russell, (Mon May 31, 5:01 am)
[PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way, Linus Torvalds, (Mon May 31, 1:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way, Rusty Russell, (Mon May 31, 6:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way, Américo Wang, (Mon May 31, 7:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way, Rusty Russell, (Mon May 31, 8:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way, Linus Torvalds, (Mon May 31, 8:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way, Linus Torvalds, (Mon May 31, 9:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way, Linus Torvalds, (Mon May 31, 9:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] module: make locking more fine-grained., Américo Wang, (Mon May 31, 10:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] module: make locking more fine-grained., Rusty Russell, (Mon May 31, 10:55 pm)