On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:07:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
quoted text
> Why are "readl"s protected by spinlock anyway ? Can't we just move the locking 
> past the code above ?

Good question - and there seems to be a deadlock waiting to happen -
sa1111_wake() re-takes the same lock.

I think we should kill all the spinlock in sa1111_resume().
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/