Re: [PATCH 7/17] arch/arm/common: Add missing spin_unlock_irqrestore

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Marek Vasut
Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 - 10:07 am

Dne St 26. května 2010 17:56:14 Julia Lawall napsal(a):

Why are "readl"s protected by spinlock anyway ? Can't we just move the locking 
past the code above ?

I'm no sa1111 expert though, Russell ?

Cheers
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 7/17] arch/arm/common: Add missing spin_unlock_ ..., Marek Vasut, (Wed May 26, 10:07 am)
Re: [PATCH 7/17] arch/arm/common: Add missing spin_unlock_ ..., Russell King - ARM Linux, (Wed May 26, 11:43 am)