On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 17:11 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
quoted text
> > Implementation-wise it probably ties into setpidle, its simply that a task
> > has a pair of idle values, a dynamic one and a base one, the dynamic one
> > being the base one but updatable temporarily by drivers.

quoted text
> How does this address the loss of wakeup events while using suspend? 
> (For example the 2 issues formulated by Alan Stern in [1])

By not suspending obviously.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/