Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Heinz Diehl
Date: Thursday, May 20, 2010 - 10:12 am

On 20.05.2010, Richard Kennedy wrote: 


No, unfortunately not. My machine is mainly designed to run squid,
and it suffered from very long stalls. After posting the problem, I was
advised to read about vm.dirty_ratio and vm.dirty_background_ratio, and
lower these. I tried several combinations, and with 4/2, the stalls
vanished completely.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%, Larry Woodman, (Thu May 20, 4:20 am)
Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%, Heinz Diehl, (Thu May 20, 5:29 am)
Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%, Richard Kennedy, (Thu May 20, 6:47 am)
Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%, Heinz Diehl, (Thu May 20, 10:12 am)
Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Thu May 20, 4:48 pm)
Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%, Zan Lynx, (Thu May 20, 5:48 pm)
Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Thu May 20, 6:11 pm)
Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%, David Miller, (Thu May 20, 11:18 pm)
Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%, Jan Kara, (Fri May 21, 8:50 am)
Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%, Jan Kara, (Fri May 21, 9:00 am)
Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%, Ric Wheeler, (Mon May 24, 12:50 pm)
Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%, Christoph Hellwig, (Tue Jun 8, 11:49 am)
Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%, Larry Woodman, (Tue Jun 8, 12:01 pm)