Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Sunday, May 2, 2010 - 1:06 pm

> > So what needs to be said here is 'frontswap is XX times faster than

I would like comparison of swap-to-frontswap vs. swap-to-RAMdisk.
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Dan Magenheimer, (Thu Apr 22, 6:42 am)
Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Apr 26, 5:49 pm)
Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Apr 30, 10:52 am)
Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Apr 30, 11:59 am)
Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Pavel Machek, (Sun May 2, 1:06 pm)
Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Martin Schwidefsky, (Mon May 10, 9:05 am)