On 05/19/2010 03:30 PM, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
quoted text
> Hi,
>
> I have some comments/questions, I hope it's not too silly:
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:01:42PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>    
>> +#ifndef ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN
>> +/*
>> + * Enforce a minimum alignment for the kmalloc caches.
>> + * Usually, the kmalloc caches are cache_line_size() aligned, except when
>> + * DEBUG and FORCED_DEBUG are enabled, then they are BYTES_PER_WORD aligned.
>> + * Some archs want to perform DMA into kmalloc caches and need a guaranteed
>> + * alignment larger than the alignment of a 64-bit integer.
>> + * ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN allows that.
>> + * Note that increasing this value may disable some debug features.
>> + */
>> +#define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long long)
>> +#endif
>>      
> I think the comment is confusing.  IIRC kmalloc() API guarantees that
> the allocated buffer is suitable for DMA, so if cache coherence is not
> handled by hardware the arch might need to set this to the cache line size,
> and that's what ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN is about. Nothing else.
>    
Is this text better?

/*
* Enforce a minimum alignment for the kmalloc caches.
* kmalloc allocations are guaranteed to be BYTES_PER_WORD aligned - 
sizeof(void*)
* If an arch needs a larger guarantee (e.g. cache_line_size due to DMA), 
then it
* must use ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to enforce that.
* Note: Do not set ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN for performance reasons.
* Unless debug options are enabled, the kernel uses cache_line_size() 
automatically.
*/

quoted text
>> +#ifndef ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN
>> +/*
>> + * Enforce a minimum alignment for all caches.
>> + * Intended for archs that get misalignment faults even for BYTES_PER_WORD
>> + * aligned buffers. Includes ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN.
>> + * If possible: Do not enable this flag for CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB, it disables
>> + * some debug features.
>> + */
>> +#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN 0
>> +#endif
>>      
> Why is this needed at all?  If code calls kmem_cache_create()
> with wrong align parameter, or has wrong expectations wrt kmalloc()
> alignment guarantees, this code needs to be fixed?
> I mean, portable code cannot assume that unaligned accesses work?
>    
ARM uses 8 bytes. I don't know why.
A 32-bit arch and unaligned 64-bit loads are not supported?

--
     Manfred
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/