login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2010
»
May
»
19
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cache lines
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Johannes Weiner
Subject:
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cache lines
Date: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 - 6:44 am
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:36:56PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:17:47PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > The 'cacheline aligned' misconception did manage to get into the ad7877 > > driver in commit 3843384a though -- it now uses ____cacheline_aligned > > instead of __attribute__((__aligned__(ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN))) as it > > should. > > OK so long as there is not a "must be cacheline aligned" requirement. > Your proposal for a __dma_aligned attribute in an arch header looks > like a good idea there.
Would you happen to know of other potential users? At this point I'd much rather just allocate the buffers dynamically and hide the issue nicely behind kmalloc(). --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Oskar Schirmer
, (Thu May 6, 3:37 am)
[PATCH] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cache lines
, Oskar Schirmer
, (Thu May 6, 3:37 am)
RE: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Hennerich, Michael
, (Thu May 6, 4:18 am)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Mike Frysinger
, (Thu May 6, 11:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cache ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Thu May 6, 11:46 am)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Daniel Glöckner
, (Fri May 7, 2:41 am)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cache ...
, Oskar Schirmer
, (Fri May 7, 3:15 am)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cache ...
, Johannes Weiner
, (Fri May 7, 5:07 am)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Mike Frysinger
, (Fri May 7, 11:23 am)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cache ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Fri May 7, 11:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cache ...
, Johannes Weiner
, (Sat May 8, 3:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cache ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Sat May 8, 9:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cache ...
, Oskar Schirmer
, (Sun May 9, 1:50 am)
[PATCH v2] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cache lines
, Oskar Schirmer
, (Mon May 10, 3:34 am)
[PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cache lines
, Oskar Schirmer
, (Mon May 10, 3:42 am)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Mon May 10, 9:39 am)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Mon May 10, 1:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon May 10, 2:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Mon May 10, 2:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon May 10, 8:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Mon May 10, 11:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Mon May 10, 11:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Mon May 10, 11:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Mon May 10, 11:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Mon May 10, 11:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Mon May 10, 11:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Pekka Enberg
, (Mon May 10, 11:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Tue May 11, 6:57 am)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Oskar Schirmer
, (Tue May 11, 7:12 am)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Tue May 11, 9:52 am)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Tue May 11, 10:31 am)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Pekka Enberg
, (Tue May 11, 11:59 am)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Tue May 11, 1:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Matt Mackall
, (Tue May 11, 1:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Tue May 11, 1:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Tue May 11, 1:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Pekka Enberg
, (Tue May 11, 1:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Tue May 11, 1:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Pekka Enberg
, (Tue May 11, 1:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Tue May 11, 1:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Tue May 11, 1:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Pekka Enberg
, (Tue May 11, 1:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Tue May 11, 1:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Pekka Enberg
, (Tue May 11, 2:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Tue May 11, 2:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Tue May 11, 2:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Alan Cox
, (Tue May 11, 3:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Tue May 11, 3:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue May 11, 6:58 pm)
RE: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Marc Gauthier
, (Tue May 11, 7:07 pm)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue May 11, 8:03 pm)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue May 11, 8:23 pm)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Tue May 11, 9:35 pm)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue May 11, 10:28 pm)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Johannes Weiner
, (Wed May 12, 3:36 am)
RE: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Marc Gauthier
, (Wed May 12, 5:35 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Wed May 12, 7:36 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Wed May 12, 7:37 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Wed May 12, 11:11 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Mike Frysinger
, (Wed May 12, 11:28 am)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Paul Mundt
, (Wed May 12, 11:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Thu May 13, 12:53 am)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Oskar Schirmer
, (Sat May 15, 11:15 am)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Mike Frysinger
, (Sun May 16, 12:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, Michal Simek
, (Sun May 16, 11:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Oskar Schirmer
, (Mon May 17, 12:29 am)
RE: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Hennerich, Michael
, (Mon May 17, 1:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Oskar Schirmer
, (Mon May 17, 1:41 am)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Mike Frysinger
, (Mon May 17, 4:49 pm)
RE: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, H Hartley Sweeten
, (Mon May 17, 5:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Oskar Schirmer
, (Tue May 18, 1:32 am)
[PATCH v2] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Oskar Schirmer
, (Tue May 18, 1:34 am)
Re: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
, Daniel Glöckner
, (Tue May 18, 2:37 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, David Woodhouse
, (Wed May 19, 5:48 am)
Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate cac ...
, David Woodhouse
, (Wed May 19, 6:00 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Nick Piggin
, (Wed May 19, 6:07 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, David Woodhouse
, (Wed May 19, 6:17 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Nick Piggin
, (Wed May 19, 6:36 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Johannes Weiner
, (Wed May 19, 6:44 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Nick Piggin
, (Wed May 19, 6:52 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Wed May 19, 7:38 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, David Woodhouse
, (Wed May 19, 7:58 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Johannes Weiner
, (Wed May 19, 8:00 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Wed May 19, 9:37 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in s ...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Wed May 19, 9:42 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 01/75] platform: prefix MODALIAS with "platform:"
stephane eranian
Re: perf_counters issue with PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP
Eric Sandeen
Re: [PATCH] xfs: do not pass unused params to xfs_flush_pages
Daniel Hazelton
Re: x86: 4kstacks default
Mathieu Desnoyers
Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc2
git
:
Johannes Schindelin
[PATCH] fetch: refuse to fetch into the current branch in a non-bare repository
Alex Riesen
Re: git exclude patterns for directory
Andreas Ericsson
Re: why not TortoiseGit
Oliver Kullmann
Re: how to move with history?
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH] http-push: making HTTP push more robust and more user-friendly
linux-netdev
:
Andi Kleen
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning
Herbert Xu
Re: Oops in tun: bisected to Limit amount of queued packets per device
gregkh
Patch "IPv6: keep route for tentative address" has been added to the 2.6.34-stable...
Patrick McHardy
Re: [rfc 02/13] [RFC 02/13] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: Add callid parser
Paul Gortmaker
[PATCH net-next 09/16] tipc: Relocate trivial link status functions to header file
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
sh: Fix compile error by operands(mov.l) in sh3/entry.S
Linux Kernel Mailing List
New device ID for sc92031 [1088:2031]
Linux Kernel Mailing List
tmpfs: depend on shmem
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drivers/acpi: use kasprintf
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Staging: et131x: prune all the debug code
openbsd-misc
:
Andres Salazar
About priorities in /etc/resolv.conf
Tonnerre LOMBARD
Re: bge0: watchdog timeout
Damien Miller
Re: Patching a SSH 'Weakness'
ropers
Re: Real men don't attack straw men
Stuart Henderson
Re: Apache Seg Fault after upgrade to 4.6 stable
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate