Re: [PATCH 7/8] x86/mrst: add vrtc driver which serves as a wall clock device

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Monday, May 17, 2010 - 2:15 am

Feng,

[ Cc'ed John ]

On Wed, 12 May 2010, Feng Tang wrote:

There is no particular reason why we need to read it in
timekeeping_init(). Nothing in the kernel needs the correct wall time
at that point. So we can safely move the setting of xtime to rtc wall
clock time to a separate timekeeping_late_init() function.

John ???
 

I do not :)


Please don't create artifical dependencies. Use a separate vrtc_lock
to serialize the access to vrtc.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: RFD: Should we remove the HLT check? (was Re: [PATCH ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri May 7, 1:33 pm)
Re: RFD: Should we remove the HLT check? (was Re: [PATCH ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri May 7, 3:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 7/8] x86/mrst: add vrtc driver which serves as ..., Thomas Gleixner, (Mon May 17, 2:15 am)
Re: [PATCH 7/8] x86/mrst: add vrtc driver which serves as ..., Thomas Gleixner, (Tue May 18, 12:38 am)