On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 15:05 +0200, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>> Where cpusets goes wrong is to have a *no* default values.
>
> It has a default, empty is still a valid value.
>

Well, it is still not sane. And in the part you snipped, I did mention,

quoted text
>> do we enforce a policy to have sane defaults
>> for subsystems if they prevent attaching "regular" tasks by default.

And to add to it, a sane default can be defined as one, where a task
can be attached to a cgroup on creation without changing any other
parameter.

Dhaval
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/