Re: [PATCH 3/8] x86/apic: allow use of lapic timer early calibration result

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 - 6:46 am

On Fri, 7 May 2010, Jacob Pan wrote:


I'd rather move lapic calibration into TSC calibration in general as
we do the same thing twice for no good reason.

That needs some code restructuring, but that's worth it.


Hehe. So you handed the patch to yourself :)


Aside of my general objection it'd be not a good idea to make this
global w/o renaming it to something sensible like
lapic_timer_frequency.
  

  Grr. I hate duplicated code.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: RFD: Should we remove the HLT check? (was Re: [PATCH ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri May 7, 1:33 pm)
Re: RFD: Should we remove the HLT check? (was Re: [PATCH ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri May 7, 3:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/8] x86/apic: allow use of lapic timer early c ..., Thomas Gleixner, (Tue May 11, 6:46 am)
Re: [PATCH 7/8] x86/mrst: add vrtc driver which serves as ..., Thomas Gleixner, (Tue May 18, 12:38 am)